They cite patients using other drugs in combination, including Alcohol, saying “Frankly, the patients need to be more honest.” They also cited the Internet getting the information into the hands of the Patients (who the company prefers would remain ignorant, shut up and do exactly what they’re told) for providing information on side effects, APPARENTLY so the patients can have the information needed to sue when the Drug screws them up.
Archives
Most Comments
Peanut Gallery
- J. LEWIS on The Stiles Unit of Beaumont
- Kennetha Wanese Lewis on The Stiles Unit of Beaumont
- Tim K on The ‘success maker’ is a waste of time
- susan on Fukishima aka Japan’s Chenyobl… and what does it mean for Colorado?
- Steven Charles family Hance on Sovereign constitutional oath activist Stephen Nalty sentenced to 36 years!
- Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. on Sovereign constitutional oath activist Stephen Nalty sentenced to 36 years!
- Jim McBride on Sovereign constitutional oath activist Stephen Nalty sentenced to 36 years!
- Les Silva on SEAL Team Glossary includes Canoeing, Winkler Hatchets & Bleed Out Videos.
- Ariel on Owl City writes lyrics most foul, shitty
- orphanellie on Does NPR have a hiring impediment?
Brother Jonah edits to add :No, thank YOU for trying to post a link to an online dope-dealing site as your email address.
I changed the name of your email to a null site, and took off the url portion of your can of Spam.
Now, some would say I’m crazy for “talking” to a spam-bot, but I reply to a lot of semi-intelligent entities, for instance a gamer who thinks that criticizing an uber-violent video game as elevating gamers to the status of Christ on the Cross level of martyrdom, and some of them actually physically human. It is for those readers who actually give three shits about what links they open on their computers that I do this service.
Original Spam message: