George Bush trusted and funded the Pakistan Military…

Even though they killed far more citizens of Pakistan than all resistance groups combined even if you count in the Chair Force Office Warriors with their drone strikes as Insurgent actions rather than Propping up the Pakistani Puppet.
So, little recent (like, this morning) revelations that the compound taken out by the Navy SEALs was on a Pakistan Military Base, one thought being that our relationship with their Army should be re-evaluated.
How honest and in depth is that revelation going to be? The Chimpleton and his not-as-stupid father had lots of contracts in oil-field construction and maintenance given to the bin Laden family, administered no doubt by Halliburton KBR. Their tame puppet military was given carte blanche to slaughter “their own” people, much like Saddam Hussein was given a similar license until his oil franchise invaded the Corporate Domain of another U.S. owned “sovereign” Puppet Dictator. The way the U.S. Army was given Carte Blanche to take out “their own people” if they happened to wear dark skin and have Native Tribal affiliations.
The compound was described a few times as being a multi-million dollar affair. That would be big money anywhere, but in a country known for (American) Corporate Wage Slavery more so.
That leads to a “what if” situation and it not only reflects bad on the current administration, but all the way back to Reagan. And in particular the Father and Son Bushwacker team. And Generally Betrays-us who was just anointed Feudal Warlord of the CIA.

Are we to believe that “fiscal conservatives” who would bean count Americans out of our very existence, saying that Health Care, pensions and even the obscenely low Minimum Wage are far too expensive for “us” to maintain, would somehow miss a multimillion dollar compound built basically on THEIR private stomping grounds and guarded (only) by The Pakistani Army…

Is Generally Betrays-us now poised to sell out his Pakistani connections so they don’t snitch him off? Like other operations against (former) Puppet Dictators like Manuel Noriega and Saddam Hussein…

Were he and the rest of the Pentagon crew blowing smoke, as they usually do, lying about maybe, you know, KNOWING where the body or the living person of Usama bin Laden was all this time, because they were paying his rent and his security guards to keep him there until it was convenient to ‘have him killed”?

Did the Navy, who unleashed the SEALs to do the murder, know for the past 8 years where their Dehumanized “target” was? And were content to have so many of “their own” privately owned, publicly funded Seamen and Marines slaughtered to keep up the pretense?

The first and most important piece of evidence is “did the suspect have a motive?”
Yes, they did. They announced beforehand that they wanted this war in order to maintain American (and British, until they could figure a way to screw the British Mob) Corporate Mafia in complete power over the entire economy of the world. Not just oil but they made the blatant point that Oil reserves being privatized rather than owned by sovereign nations was essential to that goal.
Motive: Check

Means: Oh yeah. They had a blank check. Check

Alibi: Hell no. Check

But what about that long-standing “We’re always the good guys, our Military Officers would never sell out the soldiers under their command like that, nor the American Civilians” bullshit?

A history of being Morally above such actions: HELL NO! Check

Should I bother to sneer at their alleged Humane Treatment of the Conque errr Liberated peoples in all “our” wars…. what do you think? Check

Lucy, you got some ‘splainin to do….

1 thought on “George Bush trusted and funded the Pakistan Military…

  1. AvatarJeddy

    The USA has always preferred a military dictatorship in Pakistan. Those dictators snatched all human rights and all freedom expression. Turned Pakistan into an extremely repressed country – the USA was instrumental in turning most of the population into religious extremists, it was the need of the time to fight the former Soviet Union.
    Even after General Zia was killed, the USA was not happy about the prospect of democracy which was likely event after him – the USA did not know anyone suitable enough to be the next military dictator of Pakistan.
    The polls controlled and manipulated by the USA. No government was allowed to complete its term and was quickly replaced. However when the ten year stint of democracy ended when General Musharraf took over with the blessing of the USA. But after Karzai was made puppet president of Afghanistan and Iraq was given a new leader – the USA changed its mind about General Musharraf stay in power and decided civilian rule was again a better option and democracy was good for the world in general – but the new government has proven to be absolutely corrupt it has embarrassed the USA, there is a demand the military should take over again. USA wants democracy for itself but the rest of the world should be ruled by dictators who represent the American aims, interests and objectives.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *