I find Michelle Malkin ‘style’ to be so utterly repulsive beyond all imagination! Here is an example of it as she launches her latest media bambazzle 2 weeks ago…
‘Wanted to share an exciting announcement with you all and encourage you to join and support our new web venture, TWITCHY.COM. We’ve been working furiously on the project since last fall and are now LIVE. Press release is reprinted below. Meet our awesome staff from across the country here. MICHELLE MALKIN LAUNCHES CUTTING-EDGE TWITTER CURATION WEBSITE ‘… and yada yada yada … See Malkin's TWITCHY site.
Please spare us, Michelle! You are not all that girly girl and are not all that charming with your racist behind an Asian face, Far Right USA Today hatreds. You are more nauseating than anything else and actually help paint a rather negative picture of this military barracks, Christian Far Right city called Colorado Springs with all your local and national Far Right activities.
So what theme did Michelle Malkin pick to launch her Right Winger ‘TWITCHY’ with? Why racism of course, and racism specifically targeted against the gunned down Florida Black teenager, Trayvon Martin, and racism targeted against who ever else? but the Far Right’s not so favorite president, Barack Obama. And racism directed at Spike Lee, America’s most prominent Black film director. See a common theme there? RACISM- White hatred of Blacks delivered behind a young pretty Asian woman’s face ala what flies as bar talk in Bangkok, I guess?
And others also have taken note of Malkin’s racist campaign against Trayvon Martin. See Judd Legum’s What Everyone Needs To Know About The Smear Campaign Against Trayvon Martin (1995-2012) where he mentions how ‘1. Prominent conservative websites published fake photos of Martin. Twitchy, a new website run by prominent conservative blogger Michelle Malkin, promoted a photo — purportedly from Martin’s Facebook page — that shows Martin in saggy pants and flipping the bird. The photo, which spread quickly on conservative websites and Twitter, is intended to paint Martin as a thug. As Twitchy later acknowledged, it is not a photo of Trayvon Martin.’
Yes, that’s exactly the type of racist trash that Michelle Malkin would be behind. Colorado Springs local Establishment hacks must be so very proud of this local Far Right product of our hate filled city. How proud of her they must certainly be! …NOT. Michelle Malkin is simply yet another personality, in a much longer list of local Far Right celebs that have turned the stomach of decent folk almost everywhere. What a bad rep Colorado Spring has because of its Far Right conservative nuts, and Michell Malkin is about the most nauseating of them all! Gag us, but TWITCHY is STINKY, Michelle.
Racists are easy to spot – they’re the ones always yelling racism.
Bob, your comment was as remarkably ignorant and uninformed as they can get. What it says is simply that if somebody were to accuse the NAZIs or KKK of being racists then that would mean that those who said such were racists themselves. Can anything be dumber than that though? Congratulations, Bob. You are one stupid guy!
“QUICK, HENRY—the ‘FLIT!’”
“Racism” is simply a Thought Extinguisher—a emotionally charged word with no clearly defined meaning used to forestall rational discourse by shaming people into thinking what those who use it desire.
Thought Extinguishers are frequently employed in tandem with intellectual Guilt By Association—“Nazi, “Communist,” “Socialist,” “Fascist,” “Secular Liberal,”etc.
Yes, I know, this comment is “inappropriate.”
And, OHMAGAWD! I said FLIT.
“Homophobia!”
The only way to treat a Thought Extinguisher is with a sense of humour. Enjoy this classic:
http://www.myspace.com/video/sarah-ash/why-are-black-girls-so-mean/58172957
TU QUOQUE?
I detest Tu quoque argumentation but I cannot refrain from saying that Mr Charmichael has a point: One man’s “racism” is another man’s victimhood. (Or should I use the more “ appropriate” term “person’s?”)
Since I am immune to Thought Extinguishers like “racist “and “sexist,” I got a chuckle out of the characterisation of Malkin as an Asian B-girl. I suppose it would be gilding the lotus to have called her “Mama San”Malkin.
Why does one have to argue with moron’s who think that the word racism is devoid of any real meaning, I don’t know? George, you and Bob can think that the word racist is meaningless for all I care. You guys are pitiful.
Tony, thanks for proving my point with your name calling. Glad to see that you learn nothing. Of course someone calling the KKK racist isn’t simply a racist for saying that. But since everyone knows that the KKK is about racism there is no point in calling them such. That is just being redundant.
Virtually the only people who throw around the word racism in this day and age are racists – Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Kanye West. All of them are racists. The NAACP is a racist organization every bit as much as the Neo Nazis. I don’t like any racism. The liberal definition of racism is “anyone who disagrees with me.” The actual definition of racism is hating someone because of their race.
I believe that Trayvon Martin was a good kid. I believe that Zimmerman has an overzealous vigilante. But I ask you this, if Martin were Hispanic and Zimmerman were black would you be as outraged? If your answer is no then you are a racist.
Almost everybody but you, Bob, knows that Michelle Malkin is pretty much a racist, too, just like the KKK membership types are, also. But you jumped out here in order to defend Malkin from that charge of being a racist, did you not?
Plus now, you are making idiotic charges that the NAACP is supposedly racist! The NAACP historically has been the defender of Blacks from White racism but you act like a totally ignorant moron who knows nothing about this??? What gives, Bob?
I’m sorry, Dude, but Black ‘racism’ simply is not an equal to White racism no more than Jewish ‘racism’ is equal to German racism against Jews. You really are one utterly backwards and twisted fool here on the question of what constitutes racism. I feel utterly sickened when racist apologists like yourself start blabbing away with your stupid nonsense. You are truly clueless. As to your question…?
‘But I ask you this, if Martin were Hispanic and Zimmerman were black would you be as outraged? If your answer is no then you are a racist.’
You simply do not understand that the problem is not a Zimmerman versus a Martin here, but a White racist police department against a Black teenager who was not doing anything that deserved him being murdered. YOU ARE CLUELESS, BOB!
STINKY-PEE-PEE-CACA-DOODLE-DOO!
“Why does one have to argue with moron’s who think that the word racism is devoid of any real meaning, I don’t know?”
“Moron’s” is the genitive of “moron,” not the p l u r al.
No point in arguing that one!
But, then, why argue anything when it is so much easier regurgitate trite opinions than form and expound ideas? Why argue when one can expectorate witless nursery school insults?
The sanctimonious lecture on comparative “racism” is pure Humpty Dumptyism.
“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.”
The next stage of Antonian debate is, I suppose, onions à la Glenn Beck.
WAAAH! BOO-HOO!
(earlier comment here removed per request from Safiyyah)
George, you are almost as sickening as Michelle Malkin herself definitely is. Congrats to the both of you for setting the bar that much lower in American political discourse though. You are both pretty obviously full of distrust for others based mainly on their racial backgrounds.
And for those reading here who know very little of just how racist MIchelle Malkin actually is, here is a little bit about her book published back in 2004, where she defends racial profiling of the Japanese in WW2 and racial profiling of Middle Easterners today, two groups of Asians she apparently racially distrusts though Malkin herself is of Asian descent. See wikipedia’s entry about this book of Malkin’s…
‘In Defense of Internment: The Case for ‘Racial Profiling’ in World War II and the War on Terror (ISBN 0-89526-051-4) is a 2004 book written by conservative American political commentator Michelle Malkin…’ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_Defense_of_Internment
And she definitely hates American Blacks, too! That much known is readily observed by simply reading her current blog. Perhaps there is some hidden family story there, Michelle?
Inquiring minds want to know just how you got to be so racist? Was it merely your Right Wing Catholic upbringing, or was it something personal or familial in addition to that? In any case, America’s racist Whites love it when they find people of other races who share their own White American racism. And that is what Michelle Malkin is all about.
Tony I’m curious,
“I’m sorry, Dude, but Black ‘racism’ simply is not an equal to White racism no more than Jewish ‘racism’ is equal to German racism against Jews.”
Explain please.
Does this really need an ‘explanation’ for you dull Right Wingers to be able to figure it all out?
Oignons à la Beck!
RE.: “Tony I’m curious” — Lectures in Comparative Racism
As one can see from the above temper tantrum, James, Tony Baloney is, no doubt, too overcome with onion fumes to respond. So I shall explain in his stead:
The difference between Jewish “racism”and German “racism?”
ASK ANY PALESTINIAN!
So you think that Israeli racism somehow now has historically equated Jewish and European Christian racism as being co-equals, George? Let me throw another ‘temper tantrum’ and call you a total numbskull, George. YES, that’s what you are… A NUMBSKULL.
PLUS, you are exactly the type of American racist nitwit that wants to today equate the long historical record of US White racism with anything some individual Black gang member might perhaps do to a White teenager. Ain’t that right, Skuzzz? I can’t believe that you hung around with this sort of idiotic crap inside the local Occupy CS Group so long. SICK.
And to think that you Righties were always talking about ‘educating’ others???? lol… You are a numbskull, Georgie. (and perhaps even worse than that?) You waste our time and others’ time and probably report off to quien, Pendejo? I can only imagine who it might actually be?
See what I mean?
George, you don’t get it, do you? White racism in the US is institutional and established for centuries, while any Black dislike of Whites is not like that at all.
Anti- Jewish hatred was institutionalized though out Europe FOR CENTURIES (and then by the Nazis most especially and acutely), while Jewish racism against Arabs is only now becoming institutionalized (some decades now for sure) and is no where as acute a danger as antiJewish racvism was under the Nazis.
If you are unable to understand the differences in different forms of intolerance and understand where and when the degree of intolerance becomes extreme, then I’m sorry but we really should take you as a Right Wing fool for that? This effort of yours to equate everything and not distinguish any characteristics of racial and cultural intolerance is pretty pathetic.
This last paroxysm convinces me that Trotskyite thinking is such a intractable brain disorder that the only cure for it is the ice axe.
????? ???????? ???????!
Thomas, you are an incredible bore.
She is a piece of work. As bad as Ann Coulter. Only the truly uneducated and ignorant follow either of them.