critical analysis 101

See if you can spot the first logical break in the Enquirer tabloid  headline… “US ON HIGH ALERT! Trump’s Family In Danger! Terrorists Stole Laptop With The Plans For All His Homes!” … Let us analyze it backward. You can have a lot of houses but really one home. All of them, on one laptop? Which Terrorists, and how do you know the laptop was actually stolen? If Terrorists were that close and had that much access to his property, why mess around stealing a laptop? A REAL terrorist would have just taken his shot at Trump immediately. Why wouldn’t he just stay at the damn White House which despite having the same basic layout since it was rebuilt in 1813, people haven’t ripped their way in and just “off” the punks in the house? If the U.S. was on high alert, somebody else must have reported it. Surely a respected Fake News Outlet like the enquirer would electrify the news cycle with a revelation like that, right? But here’s the first logical break… The Enquirer published the story. Simple, yes?