If an Israeli preemptive strike against a perceived threat would be legal…
By Eric Verlo
NOT MY TRIBE - 2/20/2012 3:41PM MDT - 1 Comment
If preemptive war was not against international law, wouldn’t Iran have a good case to launch a preemptive strike on Israel, with all the threats Israel and the US are making against Iran? And while the USG deliberates about how difficult hitting Iranian sites would be, how Iran’s infrastructure is distributed over such a broad expanse, etc, the same cannot be said for not-yet-Greater-Israel. If Western leaders really feared a similarly-lawless Iran, they’d be scrambling to take Israel’s 200+ nuclear arsenal into safekeeping for fear it be set off like a radioactive powder keg. How absolutely shameless to demonize Iran and at the same time count on Iran’s superior morality not to smite its truly corrupt tormentors.
Tags: Airstrikes, International Law, Iran, Israel, Preemptive War, War CrimePosted: February 20th, 2012 under News.
Comments: 1
Related articles
Comments
Comment from Lizzie Vanderbie
(IP: 190.79.13.135)
Time: March 10, 2012, 1:53 pm
As a small businessperson, you don’t have any greater leverage as opposed to truth.
Look at growth, examine the time people devote to the web and look at the range of things that they are doing. Means that great, so I am actually encouraged with the fundamentals that underlie usage growth online.

































Write a comment