Could news reports come with a disclaimer about whose viewpoint is being represented? More precisely, whose interest is being served? I don’t mean which PR firm packaged the story for the reporter, nor which media agency dispatched the PR, nor which think tank is being harvested for opinion, nor which foundation is funding the research, but WHICH COMMERCIAL ENTITY is seeking to influence public opinion. Why do we allow news spin to obfuscate its source? We have laws regulating money laundering, why not restrictions on information laundering? It’s still about following the money. Plus, every twenty minutes, the radio or television station should iterate not its call letters, but WHO OWNS IT, together with a list of all their affiliated corporations.
Archives
Most Comments
Peanut Gallery
- lizzie on The ‘success maker’ is a waste of time
- Vic Currier on Why should you attend the Denver Nalty-Byfield ENTERPRISE TRIAL?
- Robyn KenyaStar Pruitt on White Native Americans
- Debra Gill on The Stiles Unit of Beaumont
- Jim B. on Canadian firm said ‘livid’ over Trump’s fascist attacks.
- Xaldyn on The ‘success maker’ is a waste of time
- Watermark on SEAL Team Glossary includes Canoeing, Winkler Hatchets & Bleed Out Videos.
- Watermark on SEAL Team Glossary includes Canoeing, Winkler Hatchets & Bleed Out Videos.
- intelligence explosion on John Walter, don’t you know Trump says to thank the Cops who murdered you… with a plagiarized line…
- DELCO on SEAL Team Glossary includes Canoeing, Winkler Hatchets & Bleed Out Videos.