TRUE OR FALSE? SNOPES began as a website to debunk urban myths, but since being bought by a major internet conglomerate, Snopes acts as final word on which conspiracy theories have merit and which are too disruptive of the dominant narrative. As the internet grew, Snopes gathered geek cred to join National Geographic Magazine and the History Channel as de facto authoritive brands trusted to provide nonpartisan accounts of current and past events, except of course all three simply confirm the authorized story. Another would-be gatekeeper, on who says what’s what, is Wikipedea. Because the online encyclopaedia is crowd-sourced, its authority is regularly questioned, and Wikipedia entries on controversial issues are demonstraby slanted by editorial teams advancing agendas that mirror the fully funded propaganda campaigns dominating conventional media. While Snopes was great at arresting rumors about vanishing hitchhikers or microwaved babies, more and more we see Snopes consulted about news scoops and whistleblower revelations, and it’s no surprise that Snopes summarily dismisses incidiary exposees that threaten established power. Don’t take my word for it, let’s ask Snopes!
Archives
Most Comments
Peanut Gallery
- Sancho on Does NPR have a hiring impediment?
- Johnston N. Pettigrew on US inhumanity maxed at Azimuth Limit
- J. LEWIS on The Stiles Unit of Beaumont
- Kennetha Wanese Lewis on The Stiles Unit of Beaumont
- Tim K on The ‘success maker’ is a waste of time
- susan on Fukishima aka Japan’s Chenyobl… and what does it mean for Colorado?
- Steven Charles family Hance on Sovereign constitutional oath activist Stephen Nalty sentenced to 36 years!
- Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. on Sovereign constitutional oath activist Stephen Nalty sentenced to 36 years!
- Jim McBride on Sovereign constitutional oath activist Stephen Nalty sentenced to 36 years!
- Les Silva on SEAL Team Glossary includes Canoeing, Winkler Hatchets & Bleed Out Videos.