At what line in the sand will we be able to say for certain that President Obama’s hope bubble is a bust? Half of you are laughing at my naivety, the others are hushing me with your fingers crossed. Will it take a nuclear attack on Iran? More bailout? Less health? For example, when will we know whether Obama will be more a Kissinger Peace Laureate than a Mandela? A decision on Afghanistan? We have it already.
The BBC is reporting that as the US thanked Britain for recommitting forces to NATO in Afghanistan, it assured its British allies that Obama would soon be substantially increasing our own military forces. The announcement is to be made next week, the surge, 45,000 more soldiers. The White House emphatically denies this story, stating that President Obama “had not yet made a decision on troop numbers” and “would make up his mind in the coming weeks.”
And there’s your answer. And we’ve had it for awhile.
I’ll bet as a supporter of Barack Obama, you had made up your mind on Iraq and Afghanistan before you elected the hope candidate. You probably based your support for Senator Obama on the intuition that a young man smart as that had already made up his mind too, certainly on the moral issues.
What does it mean now, that Obama might be still thinking on it?
If Obama had made up his mind, or has, he’s struggling now to make up his mind about how to tell you.
Withdrawing from Iraq and Afghanistan is not ethically complicated. Financially it’s a tough move because you’ve got all those war contractor profiteers who’ve got to be weened cautiously. But there is no intermediary way. So long as the US retains authority, it’s an occupation. So long as one US company is collecting reconstruction funds, the US is serving its own interests. Rationalizations to remain as peacekeepers are just excuses to keep our hand in the till. There is no peacekeeping role for the US. We must get out, and proffer gobs of restitution.
You know who should get the Nobel Peace Prize? The Nobel committee. For their valiant hopeful effort, at the risk of looking foolish. They merit at least a nomination for Time Magazine Persons Of The Year.
The Nobel Peace Prize committee are merely helping build up the Democratic Party’s image with their repulsive decision, when in no way does the DP deserve to be built up that way. Shame on them! Your last paragraph suggests that they were involved in some heroic effort to force Obama to act as Jesus would! Jesus Christ…. I hardly think so, Eric!
I m not understanding yet why d nobel prize is given to barack obama beacause in Iraq peace is established by NATO and us forces all he is doing can be done by a illiterate person too so i dont think that he is the one to receive the honour…… Sorry if any one hurted because its personal view