You are here
Home > Posts tagged "Biased Media"

NY Times pretends the Afghanistan War Logs is news that does not fit

Is it surprising that the US newspaper of record, the NYT which prints all the news that's fit, should declare of the Wikileaks Afghanistan War Logs: there's nothing much new there? Oh REALLY? Point me to a NYT headline that read US Death Squads, or Civilian Casualties: We DO Body-Counts, or Insurgents Armed With Heat-Seeking Missiles, or War Crimes Being Committed Daily. Are we to accept that the NYT knew about these, but thought wisest not to report them? The only revelation which has been known, Pakistan Directs Taliban, is the leak they're running with, because those reports are founded on intelligence, ie dubious conjecture, to discredit the others based on first hand accounts, and to rationalize more attacks on Pakistan. I'm galled even that Wikileaks chose to let the NYT in on the advance team. Of course the NYT went right to the White House and Pentagon to warn them of what was about to be unleashed. The files were given to three news organizations simultaneously to limit the spin each might try to apply. The move to involve the press in advance was for stories and their context could hit the ground running. It's curious that most columnists and news blogs are favoring the Guardian's analysis the logs, over the NYT's. In spite of the peer review, the NYT is pushing back harder the the White House, which isn't disputing the authenticity of the material, only their outrage that the facts are being made public. Small wonder. Worse than denying them, the NYT is dismissive. No big deal. And it's working. The rest of the MSM is characterizing the "alleged" logs as "accusations." Despite the un-argued official admission that these are the unadulterated records. Most of the discussion is about the leak itself, and Julian Assange's motive as an activist. No mention he's anactivist for "justice." Not partisan, not pacifist, but moral. You'd think that shouldn't differentiate him from a journalist. The NYT has some nerve to pretend the logs aren't going to bring on a sea change of despondency about the war, even in Iraq. In particular with the soldiers' families starved for news, who will recognize from the reports the snippets of sensitive information they get from their individual soldier, with no idea it forms the character of the whole picture. We're fucked. We can't throw more at it, we can't fire truer, wiser, safer. This is unwinnable. And those are the reports our government has been seeing. Maybe that's what the NYT means to say, we/they already know this material. Our leaders have been reading these reports daily and they don't dispute that. Their glass-half-full projections for success in Afghanistan is half-full with blood. Now we know it. That's the sordid quality of these revelations. Soldiers lives FUBAR. These are more than the Pentagon Papers, these are American war-making unspun, undone. NYT et al, will have us blame the messenger, condemn Private Bradley Manning for his breach of security. Our national security depends on keeping secrets is their unchallenged theme. Do you believe

On CNN, blatantly anti-Arab Wolf Blitzer gets Free Pass, Nasr gets fired

Octavia Nasr, CNN editor, longtime reporter of Middle East affairs, was fired for not promoting the Anti-Arab blatantly partisan (and racist) non-objectivity of CNN, by posting a tweet about the death of a Shi'ite cleric from Lebanon. A cleric who championed among other things, fatwas AGAINST the Honor Killing and female circumcision standard Anti-Arab Right Wing bogeymen. And actually denounced the Iranian cleric government, so much for the notion of a Monolithic Islam. It should be noted that in the United States, which has a much smaller total population than the Billion or so Muslims total in the world, has a nasty little problem with husbands offing their wives over "infidelity" real or perceived, and in a not very surprising contrast to the Right Wing propaganda, these are more often described as "crimes of passion" and one would have to be a member of a really non-mainstream group to be given the harshest sentencing possible for such crimes. Yet a Muslim cleric, Shi'ite and with ties to Hezbollah, beats the "Awesomely Superior and Moderate"United States justice system in terms of actually defending women. To hear the Right Wing Freaks like Blitzer tell it, a Muslim would be lynched anywhere in the Arab or other Muslim countries for opposing honor killing. Blatantly Anti-Arab. Oh, and opposing United States Imperialist policies automatically gets you ostracized by the Wrong Wing as being "anti-American". How many U.S. newspaper editors or writers were actually fired for eulogizing, (in more than 256 characters including spaces like a Twitter tweet) such blatantly racist American "christian" leaders like Billy Sunday, who was a Nazi sympathizer, or Jesse Helms or Strom Thurmond or George Wallace or Jerry Falwell? Yes sir, plenty of "objectivity" there, almost as "fair and balanced" as DumFox Noose Nutwerx. While right-wing news outlets, such as the Weekly Standard and the conservative WorldNetDaily gleefully reported on Nasr’s departure from CNN, others expressed concern for the double standard which has emerged when discussing Middle East affairs in the US mainstream media. "The standard here is based on nothing that Nasr reported for CNN. [Her Twitter post] was barely a one sentence expression of sympathy. Firing her was a decision that was completely disconnected from her work so it’s a decision that’s very troubling. Lou Dobbs’s thoughts about immigrants were on CNN every night and CNN stood by him as the criticism mounted and the factual inaccuracies piled up," said Hart. "In this case, a stray comment is enough to terminate someone’s role at CNN almost overnight," he said. "The discrepancy is rather revealing and CNN would have a very hard time revealing precisely what their policy is on this. It’s hard to find precedent for this. She has a history of covering the region and that is not easily replaced."

Top