SORRY FOLKS. If you think President Obama went “Off Script” at tonight’s State of the Union Address, ask yourself why he punctuated “I have no more campaigns to run” with a HANDS-CLASPED PAUSE. In the context of his prepared remarks, that sentence was a lead-in, not a paragraph unto itself. Watch it againt and you’ll see that Obama’s pause was a trap to goad opponents to applaud so that he could “ad-lib” his crowd-pleasing “I know because I won both of them.” Prescripted mishaps are common devices to garner sympathy for embattled performers. Given that White House speechwriters anticipated a hostile reception, you’d think they would otherwise avoid lines that fed the antipathy, especially a throw-away line of exposition. Both setup and punchline added no substance to Obama’s remarks, except to grandstand.
Tag Archives: SOTU
You didn’t know Obama could speak?
Everyone’s a gaggle about President Obama’s masterful one man stand against assembled Republicans, which served to dot the exclamation mark of this SOTU performance. Like it was Daniel in the lions den, and not simply a lion tamer, sticking his head here, cracking the whip there. Obama didn’t emerge with health care, or any kind of concession. He emerged unscathed and made those lions look like mice. So what? It’s political theater. Why does this act have the Left defending Obama like the home town champion, against the corporate team, instead of the Globe Trotter act he is? When the show is over, nothing’s changed.
Obama’s Stump speech of the Union
SOTUWTF- Offshore oil and gas, nuclear energy, and “Clean Coal.” Bush could say that and smile like a dumb-ass. Can Obama pretend he’s not channeling Palin? Domestic spending freeze. Will bypass congress to establish a bipartisan commission to privatize Social Security. Didn’t call SC justices scum, put the subject of war on a backburner, the SON OF A BITCH.
After explaining how we have to get tougher with immigrants, he goes waxes nostalgic about America’s origin as a conglomeration of immigrants. What a twit.
And there’s the seesaw delivery between teleprompters. Do I think President Obama is so poor a speaker that he can’t take his eyes from the script? Of course not. The watching-a-tennis-match routine reminds me of the mesmerist’s pendulum, distracting your left brain as your right has only the drone of insignificant platitudes to lull it to sleep.
Online Twits are defending Obama against Republican arguments. Why? What is our president espousing that he didn’t aspire as a candidate, while delivering the opposite? What good is an armchair critic in the White House? Obama has only one virtue over his predecessor, a better bedside manner.
Is there anything to make of the pattern of applause. Apparently the Supreme Court up front is not to applaud on any issue, lest they be seen as partisan. Legislators are supposed to applaud on partisan issues. Although as de facto head of the Democratic party, you’d think the president would get a positive response no matter he says, unless it’s something like I don’t agree Rush Limbaugh is a big fat idiot. Which brings me to the Joint Chiefs of Staff. I wasn’t watching the old soldiers closely until Obama mentioned withdrawing from Iraq, which elicited no applause from them. Another subject that appeared to meet their disapproval was about Don’t Ask Don’t Tell. As if the entire SOTU audience participation was choreographed. The old warlords reacted entirely in character. But weren’t they attending to a speech by their Commander in Chief? What subordinates don’t applaud their boss? Unless I have a mistaken notion of who serves who.
Now the room goes quiet and eyes moisten for a mendaciously manipulative bit, worthy of the best:
Unfortunately, too many of our citizens have lost faith that our biggest institutions – our corporations, our media, and yes, our government – still reflect these same values. Each of these institutions are full of honorable men and women doing important work that helps our country prosper. But each time a CEO rewards himself for failure, or a banker puts the rest of us at risk for his own selfish gain, people’s doubts grow. Each time lobbyists game the system or politicians tear each other down instead of lifting this country up, we lose faith. The more that TV pundits reduce serious debates into silly arguments, and big issues into sound bites, our citizens turn away.
No wonder there’s so much cynicism out there.
No wonder there’s so much disappointment.
I campaigned on the promise of change – change we can believe in, the slogan went. And right now, I know there are many Americans who aren’t sure if they still believe we can change – or at least, that I can deliver it.
But remember this – I never suggested that change would be easy, or that I can do it alone. Democracy in a nation of three hundred million people can be noisy and messy and complicated. And when you try to do big things and make big changes, it stirs passions and controversy. That’s just how it is.
Those of us in public office can respond to this reality by playing it safe and avoid telling hard truths. We can do what’s necessary to keep our poll numbers high, and get through the next election instead of doing what’s best for the next generation.
But I also know this: if people had made that decision fifty years ago or one hundred years ago or two hundred years ago, we wouldn’t be here tonight. The only reason we are is because generations of Americans were unafraid to do what was hard; to do what was needed even when success was uncertain; to do what it took to keep the dream of this nation alive for their children and grandchildren.
Then it’s back to the stump speech testimonials. And his faith in the resilience of the American People. What, lack of health care and exposure hasn’t killed them yet? What would you think of a doctor who turned you away with the prognosis, “aw, you’ll make it.”
Problem solving by U.S. assassination
Word is out, confirming Seymore Hersh’s alarming report of last year, about the Cheney/Bush special forces tasked with assassinating terrorism suspects. Where others do it, such paramilitary raids are called “death squads.” While their existence is being admitted, Congress is upset they weren’t told sooner about the extra-judicial homicide plans. But didn’t President Bush put us all on notice in his 2006 State of the Union Address? What did you think he was snickering about when he said:
“All told, more than 3,000 suspected terrorists have been arrested in many countries. And many others have met a different fate. Let’s put it this way: They are no longer a problem to the United States and our friends and allies.”
George Bush received an ovation from both sides of the aisle with that punch line. From the same politicians who are insisting they didn’t know the US was killing whoever they couldn’t imprison. The same Democrats and Republicans who are eager to report that the nefarious Bushco devices –being pinned on Dick Cheney– thankfully never went operational.
And we don’t have secret prisons. And we don’t torture.
President Obama is closing Guantanamo Prison. As soon as we figure out where to incarcerate its every last detainee.