Original Anti-Zionist jokes in Monty Python’s LIFE OF BRIAN remain cut out of Criterion special edition
By Eric Verlo
NOT MY TRIBE - 11/29/2009 11:14AM MDT - 13 Comments
Think you know the saga of the deleted scenes from Monty Python’s LIFE OF BRIAN? Not if you trust Wikipedia. The 1979 comedy didn’t just take the mickey out of Jesus and the feuding Palestinian Liberation fronts, it poked good fun at Zionists, as goose-stepping racists led by Eric Idle’s OTTO the NAZIRENE who was determined to promote Jewish racial purity, carve a Lebensraum from the “traditional Jewish areas of Samaria,” displace the Samaritans into internment camps, and plan an anschluss of Jordan to “create a great Jewish state that will last a thousand years.” My, my, my. But the defamed parties had the last laugh. They acquired the studio with the rights to the film, obliterated the offending celluloid, reedited the video release, and have rewritten cinematic history.
Maybe you don’t care what Israel has been doing to the Palestinians. Did you know someone is messing with the legacy of Monty Python? We had the comedy sketches memorized in college. Who could have imagined the originals would be vulnerable to tampering?
I’m not sure this is an overreaction. Monty Python is not Shakespeare, what is. But it’s not Nicholas Sparks either. For a populist phenom it rivals Swift. This is book burning, is what it is. A sinister effacing of creative work. Life of Brian is considered as in contention for Britain’s greatest film comedy, and for your consideration, instead of a director’s cut, we’ve got a censor’s cut.
Here’s the lowdown in brief: three integral scenes of the theatrical release were removed from the video version. The third scene was recut to make up for the absence of the first two. When Criterion released a new copy, the missing sequences were included in the extras as “deleted scenes,” represented by mangled outtakes, from which key lines were cut. An official narrative was fabricated to recount how the sequences had been removed from the original version to improve the flow, the crude outtakes testifying to why they didn’t make the cut.
But that all bullocks. And the niggling weak spot to this digital book burning are, ironically enough, the BOOKS published in 1979 of the screenplays to accompany the film’s release. Plus anyone who remembers seeing the film in its first release.
Not My Tribe has suffered its own internal dissension over comparing Israel to the Nazis. Apparently it’s SO not done, not even Monty Python can get away with it.
You may have revisited the video many times, now the DVD, maybe you read about the scandals about the film’s release, maybe you memorized some of the Biggus Dickus dialog; are you curious that you missed the bits about Samaria, Jordan and purified Jewish blood?
When the Catholic church objects to a movie, it declares a boycott. Zionists take a more effective strategy. When pulling funding from the project doesn’t work, they buy the rights and delete the scenes. You’d think a film as celebrated as Life of Brian would be inviolate to culture vandals. And so far the desecration has escaped the legions of Monty Python fans. Wikipedia recounts how Otto’s scenes were deleted from the film, and thankfully resurfaced to be included as outtakes on the 2007 Criterion edition. But the account is untrue.
From restored out-takes we might surmise that Jewish objection were limited to the Star of David embellished as a swastika, but from the un-restored material it seems that the modern censors objected to Zionists depicted as determined to carve their own Lebensraum in Samariaby means of Anschluss and internment, for the sake of a third Jewish reich. Oh My Goodness.
The Criterion edition of Monty Python’s Life of Brian has some famously restored scenes, alleged to have been cut from the original version. They’re available again, and you can see them on Youtube. But it’s Poppycock. The scenes in question were actually removed from the video release, and “lost” by the studio which took over handmade films. The deleted scenes were actually out-takes of the originals. Fortunately, the screenplay published to accompany the 1979 release has the original lines, which vary quite curiously from what’s being peddled as the restored original. Yes, the deleted scenes have deleted scenes.
If you saw the 1979 film in the theater, you might remember Otto, the Hitleresque Zionist with the curiously non-German accent. Here is the original script made from the final take. The out-take restored as “deleted scenes” stray considerably from these lines. The lines in bold have simply been simply clipped.
BRIAN slips out through the back door and descends some steps into MANDY’S garden where he sits, head in hands.
Suddenly a voice assails him.
OTTO: Hail, Leader!
BRIAN: What?
OTTO: Oh, I– I’m so sorry. Have you seen the new Leader?
BRIAN: The what?
OTTO: The new Leader. Where is the new leader? I wish to hail him. Hail, Leader. See.
BRIAN: Oh. Who are you?
OTTO: My name. Is. Otto.
BRIAN: Oh.
OTTO: Yes. Otto. It’s time, you know. . .
BRIAN: What?
OTTO: . . . Time that we Jews racially purified ourselves.
BRIAN: Oh.
OTTO: He’s right you know. The new leader. We need more living room. We must move into the traditionally Jewish areas of Samaria.
BRIAN: What about the Samaritans?
OTTO: Well, we can put them in little camps. And after Samaria we must move into Jordan and create a great Jewish state that will last a thousand years.
BRIAN: Yes, I’m not sure, but I . . .
OTTO: Oh, I grow so impatient, you know. To see the Leader that has been promised our people for centuries. The Leader who will save Israel by ridding it of the scum of non-Jewish people, making it pure, no foreigners, no gypsies, no riff-raff.
BRIAN: Shh! Otto!
OTTO: What? The Leader? Hail Leader!
BRIAN: No, no. It’s dangerous.
OTTO: Oh, danger: There’s no danger. (flicks his fingers) Men!
A phalanx of armed, rather sinister, men appear from the shadows and fall in.
OTTO: Impressive, eh?
BRIAN: Yes.
OTTO: Yes, we are a thoroughly trained suicide squad.
BRIAN: Ah-hah.
OTTO: Oh yes, we can commit suicide within twenty seconds.
BRIAN: Twenty seconds?
OTTO: You don’t believe me?
BRIAN: Well . . .Yes . . .
OTTO: I think you question me.
BRIAN: No. No.
OTTO: I can see you do not believe me.
BRIAN: No, no. I do.
OTTO: Enough. I prove it to you. Squad.
SQUAD: Hail Leader.
OTTO: Co-mmit Suicide.
They all pull out their swords with military precision and plunge them into themselves in time, falling in a big heap on the ground. Dead.
OTTO: (with pride) See.
BRIAN: Yes.
OTTO: I think now you believe me. Yes?
BRIAN: Yes.
OTTO: I think now I prove it to you, huh?
BRIAN: Yes, you certainly did.
OTTO: All dead.
BRIAN: Yes.
OTTO: Not one living.
BRIAN: No.
OTTO: You see, they are all of them quite dead. See I kick this one. He’s dead. And this one’s dead, I tread on his head. And he’s dead. And he’s dead. All good Jewish boys, no foreigners. But they died a hero’s death and their names will live forever. Helmut . . . Johnny . . . the little guy . . . er . . . the other fat one . . . their names will be remembered . . . eventually . . . forever. So now I go. Hail Leader.
BRIAN: Wait Otto. You can’t just leave them all here.
OTTO: Why not–they’re all dead.
One oh the ‘corpses’ farts. There is a giggle.
OTTO: Wait a minute. There is somebody here who is not dead. There’s somebody here who is only pretending to be dead. Stand up, you.
One of the bodies stands up sheepishly. As he does so, he stands on someone else who quite clearly says ‘Ow.’
OTTO: Who said ‘ow’? You’re not dead either. Neither are you. Stand up, stand up, all of you. Oh, my heck, is there not even one dead?!
They have all stood up averting their eyes in shame.
HELMUT: No, sir. Not one.
ADOLF: We thought it was a practice, sir.
OTTO: Oh my cock! Tomorrow, as a punishment, you will all eat–pork sausages!
There is a horrified muttering at this suggestion. OTTO turns sharply to BRIAN.
OTTO: OK. Tell the Leader that we are ready to die for him the moment he gives the sign.
BRIAN: What sign?
OTTO: The sign that is the sign, that shall be the sign. Men, forward!
OTTO’S MEN march away singing their exciting song.
OTTO’S MEN’S SONG:
There’s a man we call our Leader.
He’s fine and strong and brave,
And we’ll follow him unquestioning
Towards an early grave. He-e gives us hope of sacrifice
And a chance to die in vain,
And if we’re one of the lucky ones,
We’ll live to die again.BRIAN: Silly bugger.
A second scene involves Otto and his Nazirenes receiving the sign, as the crucifixion party departs the city gates.
JUDITH now is running through the crowded streets. She reaches some steps and climbs up onto a roof. Quickly, she opens a basket and releases a flock of pigeons.
A very STRANGE MAN is lying on a lonely hilltop. Suddenly he rouses himself, sits up and peers into the distance towards Jerusalem.
A flock of pigeons flies up against the sun.
Seeing this, the STRANGE MAN rouses himself and does an extremely odd but elaborate dance.
Further away, on an even lonelier hilltop, a pile of straw moves to reveal that it is in fact a MAN dressed in straw. He watches the STRANGE MAN’S dance closely.
STRAW LOOK-OUT: It is the sign!
Instantly OTTO appears, with all his men.
OTTO: The sign that is the sign?
LOOK-OUT: Yes!
OTTO: Men! Our time has come! Our leader calls! Men forward!
The MEN march into the wall and each other.
OTTO: Oh my cock.
Of course the omission of Otto’s gang created a problem for the film’s final scene, where his men repeat their self-sacrifice beneath the crosses. Here was the original sequence:
Suddenly PARVUS looks up. He has heard something.
OTTO and his MEN appear over the skyline.
BRIAN: Otto! (a new flicker of hope in his eyes)
OTTO: Men, charge!
They charge.
The ROMANS, seeing this formidable army bearing down on them, finger their swords rather nervously and then break and run away back towards the city gate.
BRIAN’S face lights up with renewed hope as he sees OTTO’S army advancing at the double. The army arrives under the cross, swords held aloft. The ROMANS have all run away.
OTTO: (to Brian) Leader! We salute you. Men! Die for your cause!
With immaculate precision they all run themselves through, including OTTO.
OTTO: You see. Every man a hero. They died for their country.
BRIAN: You silly sods.
For the re-edited video and subsequent DVD versions, audio voice-overs were added to explain Otto’s final charge. None of this was in the original.
–[A group of faux oriental-looking warriors come over a hill, led by their leader, King Otto. Care to venture a guess as to who they are? Yes, it's...]
WORKER
The Judean People’s Front!PARVUS
The Judean People’s Front!OTTO
Forward all!WORKERS
Look out! The Judean People’s Front!–[The JPF stop in front of Brian's cross.]
OTTO
Ve are the Judean People’s Front! Crack suicide squad. Suicide Squad!
Attack!!!
–[drumroll]
–[They all ceremonially whip out their weapons, open a hatch in their
armor, and proceed to kill themselves.]OTTO
Ungggghhh… that showed ‘em, huh?BRIAN
You silly sods.

Posted: November 29th, 2009 under Research.
Comments: 13
Related articles
Comments
Comment from british18
(IP: 76.25.184.49)
Time: December 3, 2009, 11:18 am
You won’t get much advertising given the blatant anti-Semitism posted by your own staff. In fact, I have already convinced one of your advertisers to cancel and if anyone else advertises, I will convince them to cancel, too.
Comment from Brother Jonah
(IP: 97.112.129.208)
Time: December 3, 2009, 11:59 am
The notion that one must Kill for God is the true blasphemy and, seriously, is more anti-Semitic than any other statement made by anybody anywhere. Including Hitlers rants on the subject.
Although many believe that pointing out the Blasphemy of saying that God instructs us to murder people in His name, is somehow Anti-Christ or Anti-Semitic.
I’ll also point out again that the Samaritans mentioned in the deleted scenes, Were Hebrews and their other name was “The Kingdom of ISRAEL”
A lot of people who use “Israel” and “Judah” interchangeably don’t know what the Freak they’re talking about and display their Anti-Semitic Ignorance with each screaming ranting post about how the Modern State of Israel is somehow a Victim of Anti-Semitism or that anybody who opposes the Likud Party and their Blatantly Racist Policy Of Impriisoning and Exterminating Their Fellow Israelites is somehow a Nazi.
Report that to your masters.
Comment from Brother Jonah
(IP: 97.112.129.208)
Time: December 3, 2009, 12:27 pm
Say, british, do your Royals still subscribe to the ridiculous belief that they’re ordained by God to rule the entire World?
Because, really, I never saw any effort on their part to tone that shit down.
And they’ve definitely never slowed down on their claim that they’re actually Better than anybody else.
There’s also the fact that Bessy the Second’s daddy called the precursors to the Modern State of Israel “Terrorists”. And ordered quite a lot of them to be murdered. And that Bessy Her Royal Self ordered the murders of quite a few Irish gentlemen for the “crime” of opposing Her Royal Imperial Rule.
I guess it’s like the shifting sands of history… shifting, shifting, shifting….
Comment from Eric
(IP: 174.22.191.250)
Time: December 3, 2009, 2:57 pm
Dear British18,
I’m with you entirely, if you don’t like someone’s politics, consider BOYCOTT, DIVESTMENT and SANCTIONS against whoever is propping them up. Anyway, we’ve no intention to curb our speech in deference to guilt-plagued advertisers.
But please explain, where is it that NMT has “blatant anti-Semitism?” How is criticizing racism and genocide an attack on the Jewish faith?
In the case of LIFE OF BRIAN, if I defaced someone’s satirical legacy because their jokes offended me, I’d answer for it instead of labeling accusers as anti-me.
Comment from macladd
(IP: 89.248.172.14)
Time: December 4, 2009, 2:32 pm
hands off the Parrot Sketch
Comment from shadowfirebird
(IP: 89.240.128.98)
Time: July 14, 2010, 11:12 am
Nice try, but these scenes were not in the original UK release.
I know memory can be fooled — and so do you, obviously — but I certainly remember thinking that I didn’t understand the suicide scene.
It was because Otto had been edited out as not being very funny.
Comment from Eric
(IP: 64.134.25.66)
Time: July 15, 2010, 3:04 am
You, my fellow Python fan, may be conjuring memories of watching the video re-release. I cannot attest to the UK release, but a variance with the US version seems improbable.
So it’s not a matter of my memory against yours, I’ll upload scans of the promotional material which accompanied the theatrical release, which highlighted Eric Idle’s very funny Otto.
I’d sooner lose memory than sense of humor.
Comment from Christopher Rushlau
(IP: 64.222.231.80)
Time: August 19, 2010, 2:03 pm
This is remarkable stuff, undoing my oracular utterance that true resistance to Jewish fascism had only begun to be noticed and denounced in the recent past, say after the 2006 operation in Lebanon.
Some jokes are so good, let us say, that it takes some time for the laughter to explode.
Comment from Chris Rushlau
(IP: 64.222.231.80)
Time: August 19, 2010, 2:16 pm
Very funny, but it’s taken thirty years for the audience to get the joke.
Comment from Chris Rushlau
(IP: 64.222.231.80)
Time: August 19, 2010, 2:19 pm
Between the quirks of this comment function and my own command of English (“true resistance to Jewish fascism to be noticed and denounced”), a merry time is being had by all. british18, may I include you?
Comment from Brother Jonah
(IP: 71.221.105.100)
Time: August 19, 2010, 3:08 pm
Of course, the deal remains that while Zionism represents one part of Judaism, it isn’t Judaism or the entire Jewish people
It has a taint to it, though, that many who follow it become what they despised so much, just by their justifiable anger at the Nazis. It’s like taking a vow of eternal hatred against… hate.
Since the Python players chose to mock that aspect of it, because what else can one do? Spiral it further into the abyss with hatred for hatred? An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth makes the whole world blind and unable to chew their food. But since humor is used rather than a simple “Fuck You! Kill Everybody!” answer, which is the unfortunately more common response…
People who hate, feel they have a just cause to Hate. If I recall correctly, that was the entire beginning of the long sad hateful story. How does one respond rationally to insanity?
I congratulate anybody who can or at least tries.
What if the editors made the (once in a lifetime for the Pythons) decision to cut a scene because it was too tacky or tasteless or if there was simply no way to address the monumental amount of hate built up over the centuries? The Flying Circus would have still at least tried to take it down a notch or three.
Any description of the problems involved would fill bookshelves, or be overly simplified.
Comment from Christopher Rushlau
(IP: 70.16.102.217)
Time: August 20, 2010, 10:23 am
I’ll take the second option: over-simplification. I went to law school in the US, so have a highly-developed sense of the ridiculous.
Law is not a thing, but an activity. That sounds pretty pseudo-intellectual. Prayer is not a thing, but an activity. Thought. Looking. Seeking.
Let me try this: law is to the group what prayer is to the individual. It is trying to test ideas to the ultimate. Law supplements prayer in that personal seeking can never entirely out-maneuver self-seeking.
The adversarial process is, as Dahrendorf said of the jury system, upping the odds that truth might be noticed. If someone on the jury wants to notice it.
Israel is thus understandable as failed law, ridiculous law. There is no way to square the circle of any adjective democracy, Jewish or left-handed or grapefruit. By that standard (“rarefied”, as a moderate critic of Israel would chasten my approach), the world’s crisis at present is that nation states, with geographical boundaries, cannot be true democracies because each state discriminates against non-citizens. For example. But we can aspire from where we are to such a pure democracy: where non-citizens are looked out for as well as citizens (as opposed to merrily blowing the former, with an occasional latter, away with a “targeted airstrike”).
Now the claim would be that this idea of law is simple and clear enough to inveigle the insane, the racist, the hateful, the brother, into the neutral forum, the empty space filled only with people, to see whose ideas and passions and hunches are noblest.
What Monty Python and Cleese, QC, etal., did was praise the legal system by mocking its flaws.
Instead of an OBE, get Cleese a QC.
Comment from Brother Jonah
(IP: 71.221.105.100)
Time: August 20, 2010, 5:30 pm
Being nice to the strangers that dwell amongst Israel (the people) IS part of the law of Moses. But every aspect of history including the Bible is filled with examples of the rulers, whichever class or clan, Ignoring Living Hell out of their own laws.
The Old Testament especially, shows a massive Hebrew-on-Hebrew Crime spree. Forget being nice to foreigners, they weren’t even nice to each other. I see it as showing that people aren’t perfect and aren’t capable of creating a perfect system.
Even with Guidance.
Kind of like our laws in America and England state that freedom of speech is exactly that. Then you get a few hundred years of smart-ass people who study the Laws just to find loopholes. And each succeeding warp of the original law builds on all previous warps.
And each set of ruling caste who spend their entire lives breaking the Law, which is designed to outlive them anyway, add a layer of dung on the name of Law or God, and their crimes get attributed to God instead of those who piss on the Law, and the enemies of those kings develop a layer of skepticism when it comes to dealing with not merely the Kings, but the people as well. Extra embellishments like the recurrent “The King IS the law, breathing and talking” theme just make it worse.
Then when these attitudes toward both Law and People gets swapped back and forth damn I just passed out at the keyboard for a brief moment.
But the resentments grow, and get reciprocated, back and forth ad infinitum? No, because there is no infinity nor eternity, it’s a closed system.. the system decays even faster.
That’s not the amazing part.
The amazing part is that it lasted this long with so few modifications of the original that it gets revisited generation after generation.
I don’t often ponder infinity. It seems a path to madness.
The Python Players did a song about it though, “The Universe”
The occasional break from incessant rationalization does wonders.
Humor works best when it bites at themes one finds sacred.

































OTTO: Hail, Leader!
OTTO: Men! Our time has come! Our leader calls! Men forward!
Write a comment