You are here
Home > Posts tagged "Might Makes Right"

NATO, Puppet Afghans ask why would Taliban publish plans if they’re real?

I don't know more than they do but here's a really good guess... Maybe it's because they are in negotiations and showing their ability to infiltrate even NATO ranks is a major card in their hand? The Karzhai Puppet Government and their NATO Overlords "liberators" say, predictably, that the document published on the Taliban's Web Site detailing the plans for security at the loya jinga (congress, parliament) meeting is "forged". Why WOULD they show one card out of many in their hand, one that says "Ha ha, we've got our people everywhere, including the NATO command structure"? Yes, why would they demonstrate their strength in a subtle way like that rather than acting like the crazed barbarians that NATO propaganda paints them to be? Oh, and in case the point was missed... on a Web Site the Taliban maintains But we're supposed to think of them as subhuman inferior savages who are incapable of civil behavior. Suddenly it's not very easy to look down on them. Like the "Civilized" NATO StormTrooper Thugs who shoot babies and launch Terror-drones against people without even knowing exactly who they'll kill. Real Ubermenschen, they are. Part of the NATO propaganda is the Karzhai Terror Government is superior to the Taliban because he was educated abroad, meaning, "Taught how to behave like a White Person". Of course, nothing racist about that. Or the idea that the White NATO Liberato Overlord Massa Boss-Mans have to stay there because even their puppet Karzhai is "too savage". Perhaps the British puppet Raj was really to protect Afghanistan against the Turks, as claimed. Or, in an alternate and entirely believable scenario, the Afghans had stopped the Turks, and their social and ethnic predecessors the Byzantine Empire. And the Romans. Also the Persians, and even Alexander, conqueror of just anybody you could think of... wouldn't even try to conquer them. Toss in Peter the Great of Russia. But of course even with all the attempts to break in and rob the country blind, and then come back later for the white cane and seeing-eye dog, they were "isolated" throughout their entire non-centralized society and absolutely NOBODY could have possibly learned how to deal with the "Civilized" conquerors on equal terms. And, imagine that, they defeated all the previous empires while the British were still living in mud huts.

The Hail Mary pass still would need an Immaculate Reception.

So, in the spirit of Code Duello, trial by combat, Might Makes Right and all that stupid crap, what happens when Texas Christian U., Southern Methodist University, Brigham Young and Notre Dame square off in a four way winner take all? Will GOD Almighty choose the leaders of His Creation from a trial by combat amongst colleges representing the seminaries of American Christendom? Would He toss in a "ringer" like the New Orleans Saints? What if He uses the hole in the roof of the Cowboys Stadium to barf on "His" Team? Sound ridiculous? How much more so the notion that He really cares who wins a football game? Or that a victory on the battlefield of Real War means that your own country is far more righteous and beloved than The Other Side?

Flag pin betrayal

Of course you know I would just never unleash a vicious attack like mocking a fake-patriot or faux-elitist move like wrapping ones bullshit in either the flag or the cross. Just have to point out that the flag lapel pin, the one Republicans bitched and whined so much about Democrats not wearing, the one Lisa Czeladtko is wearing in the picture chosen by Gag-Zette writer Daniel Chacon when "calling out" Ed over his Free Speech opposing a political candidate. Not that The Gag-zette (Colorado Springs Gazette, "Freedom" Communications") has ever so much as given a mild tsk-tsk'ing to violent attacks on Free Speech in Colorado Springs, usually instigated by City Council or persons very close to them.St Paddies Day 2007 leaps to my mind. Or to Fake Patriotism. You'll notice, if you're observant, that the "flag" in question has 7 stripes and 18 stars. It's a sign of the depths of rabble rousing the "elitists" will plumb when wanting to silence any opposition to their agenda as "unpatriotic" and Anti-Christ. "Calling out" by the way, is in Colorado and other Western states, a challenge to physical violence. Usually issued by a heavily armed Coward who is so sure of victory that he assumes he can force the other person to apologize for saying anything. Then go get drunk with his redneck comrades. Might makes right, Oderint dum Metuant "let them hate us as long as they fear us". Maybe Chacon should more carefully consider HIS choice of words. That way he wouldn't leave himself open to Attacks errr... criticism that lumps him in with the likes of Caligula, King Charles II of England and George W. Bush. So the Rich Pigs are afraid their piglets will see what poverty looks like, instead of, as Ms Lisa Siddhattha suggests, hiding the poverty from the delicate eyes of the Piglets? Lest they see the human price of their own opulent lifestyle. Actually, her ties to Developers, like the Flag Pin, betray her true agenda. According to the Developer Religion, evidenced by the Real Estate Developer who "founded" Colorado Springs, the idolatrous statue of whom sits in the meddle of the intersection at the Northwest corner of Acacia Park, According to their money worship Cult of Mammon, the sight of poverty in CS would drive down real estate prices. Therefore they wouldn't have enough blood-money profits from selling their stolen-at-gunpoint land. One of their High Priestesses, Janis Heuberger, wrote in her blog that Bicycles should be banned from acacia Park, because "only the Homeless" ride bicycles. There were further suggestions by one of her sycophantic supporters that people who LOOK homeless should be banned from city parks. Imagine that, the "non-elitists" as they style themselves, seeking to impose a conformist dress code on the citizens of Colorado Springs. To protect their profit margin. And even ban an economical, non-wasteful and healthy form of transportation. Unless you drive a gas-guzzler you're not welcome in Colorado Springs. Nothing elitist about that, No Sir! And failing to admit that it was Real Estate Developers who

Is this perhaps a call to arms?

We have a far greater right to resist either the Minutemen or the actually Deputized Racists like Sheriff Arpaio or the Border Patrol, with force of deadly arms if necessary, simply because they have already demonstrated their willingness to assault, either through arrest and then beating us (while we're bound and caged, Arpaio's favorite way of "fighting") all the way up to outright Murder as in the case of the Flores Family, including 9 year old AMERICAN child Briseña, which their heroes in the Minutemen and Border Patrol and Arizona State Police and even a recent candidate for Governor of Colorado, Tancredo, are trying to help the murderers justify by claiming that Raul Flores, who is already dead and can't answer any of the charges, was "suspected" of being involved in drugs. How would we know if the PIGS aren't lying to cover for their fellow Racist PIGS in the Minutemen? My own experience with PIGS and their habit of perjuring themselves to cover their own violent crimes gives me far more reason to suspect the Police were involved in the Murder. That makes any traffic stop, any entry into some citizens domain, his home, his car, his right to travel freely without being constantly harassed and threatened by the Ku Klux Kops, could be considered a potential murder on the level of what happened to Raul and Briseña Flores. Which perhaps should be defended against with the use of deadly force? They've already declared such a "right" and a privilege to do the same to us at any time they choose. What then of OUR right to self defense, does it become null when faced with a possibly faked badge and faked warrant? They demand absolute proof of OUR identity, and despite that, as in the Flores Murders, defy the very core of their own doctrine. The scum who murdered Raul and Briseña and wounded her mother, his wife, disguised themselves as police officers. And now the Arizona Racist Pig establishment is defending them, praising them with faint damns. They're the type who would be and ARE the majority of the Minutemen and the Police Establishment. Punks who actually WANT power over other human beings and whose only hope of gaining any such power is to band together with a gang of armed Like-minded COWARDS. What would morally keep Americans from defending themselves against THEM? No morality the Minutemen display. Nor any interpretation of the law their members or Police Allies obey. The only argument they can possibly make for THEIR privilege to kill any of us at will, or at whim, and deny us the actual RIGHT to self defense, would be their "Might Makes Right" doctrine they deploy readily in Iraq and Afghanistan. Only in this matter their armed might is turned to subjugating Americans, IN America, to the arbitrary Might Makes Right doctrine. They demonstrated it in the matter of professor Henry Louis Gates Jr. being dragged away in handcuffs for daring to "talk back" to the Cambridge Police,

Tennessee Fire-Non-Fighters and the Bible

The language used by the fire-non-fighter is heavily ingrained indoctrination. There's a movement with some familiar names on the letterheads, spokesfreaks not leaders, Beck, Hannity, O'Reilly, Malkin... people whose ambitions are to create an American Sha'ariah based on their own interpretation of the Word. Or more importantly how the words of the Word get translated into English. They believe that somehow King James was a Liberal. Rather than the really vicious killer he was, and point to speculations on his sexuality, which really doesn't make three quarters of a fat rats ass. The dude was a killer, that trumps any other social or moral consideration you could think of. But the contention is that the Shakespearian English, and they toss in the "Shakespeare was queer, you know" wink wink nudge nudge low-flying canard as evidence, used in the KJV 1611 was "effeminate". Oh, he's a lumberjack, he's okay. (so gay?) And they're actually Re-Writing the Bible to reflect what they think it should be. Nothing new there. Even by their own admission. Many of them cite the "Thou shalt not Kill" commandment, saying that "They" meaning, not the person speaking who is as ignorant of who "They" are as he is of the actual grammatical structure of Classical Hebrew, BUT "They" Apocryphally proved that it really should have said "Thou shalt not Murder" and thus place a distinction among the concepts of Killings not authorized by the King-du-jour and those which are authorized. AND then make the silly ass demand that WE, the "peasants", never question "Their" word on it. Does Hannity or Malkin or Beck or Jack van Impe or any single one of their Demented Demonic Disciples actually speak Classical Hebrew fluently? I've never met one who does and I've been in fundamentalist churches all my life. The same way the Lying Freaks say that They, and only They, can possibly know the Original Intent of the "Founding Fathers" who just by a coincidence aren't the ones who actually FOUGHT the revolution, but those Wealthy Landed Aristocrats who commanded it. And the sources of their Arcane-yet-Unquestionable Knowledge of the Constitution are the sources of the Religious Revisionists. Karl Rove and Newt Gingrich are also in their sorry lying ChickenHawk lot. But they're going to, just like the Fire-Non-Fighter, claim that somehow They have been given the revelation that Thou Shalt Not Kill is a grammatical error in a language none of Them even speaks. Apparently the concept has been sold to more than a few individuals. And it's Mighty Convenient if those who seek to rule over everybody else offer up their version of the Word of God as being the unquestionable basis of their so-called "Authority". God Himself hath verily told us through secret Revelation that we of course are not obligated to prove in any way, that YOU must bow down before us, and accept our Mighty Rule as surely as you would His, without question or dissent Nothing new there either. The contention against "bad" kings as opposed to

Interesting wording: Taliban blamed for Afghan civilian deaths

First the generic word Taliban. Which translates, if I've got the wording right, according to the State Department, "soldier". More or less. Then "blamed for". Is that a tacit admission that they're catching the rap but not in fair measure? Then there's the notion that the "Taliban" in general and al Qa'eda in particular have been driven far from civilian population centers. So that's two conflicting if not Mutually Exclusive stories being told by the same party, the Koalition of the Killing. At its most blunt, its an admission that they're losing, in the first part, and that they were covering it up with a blanket of lies about having the Taliban driven far away from the civilians. Then there are the Wikileaks files. Which tell a third tale, by the Same Party, Koalition of the Killing, in what they thought were Secret communications. By the way, Free the Hero Bradley Manning!! Aside from that, there's an old Baptist adage provided by some Old Baptists who i happen to know. If you don't want people to find out what you're doing, don't tell anybody. There's a really sad story you hear a lot from people convicted of felonies. "My accomplice snitched me off to get a good deal from the DA." The more serious the crime, like say, War Crimes, and the more often it's committed, and the more accomplices you have... then the more people will want to find out who is responsible for those crimes, and will be snooping around. Usually armed with subpoenas and warrants but ALWAYS armed with well, Arms. Cases that involve human deaths and especially the deaths of Children tend to draw a LOT more attention. Now, the way the Army and Co. set up their communications and storage of those communications is critical to their relative success at doing their crimes. The bigger the Army, the more records, the more copies of Accomplices ratting each other out, only, in a system where they're ratting each other out to each other and the evidence stored by their own Criminal Organization to help figure out what happened when their Criminal Organization loses its collective rosie-red Arse. Such as what's happening now in Greater VietRaqiStan. I can't help but believe that quite a few people in the Pentagoons actually DID know right from wrong, they KNEW that the tactic of Might Makes Right ALWAYS has backfired, they KNEW they were telling lies... because other than them having this certain knowledge of what they were doing, and why it is WRONG, you would have to have a couple of million complete Airheads running the Weapons storage and utilizations system known as the Military, and... the largest one on the face of the Earth. Dumb, or lying. Not much of a choice, is it?

Top